The plans show the change of a small theatre in 2010 and 2012.
The pictures describe changes that had taken place in a small theatre after refurbishing and redesigning between 2010 and 2012.
It is apparent that the significant development will be made in terms of media and storage rooms; and a new lobby design along with bathrooms.
Regarding the old look of the theatre in 2010, there were two offices (admin and ticket) on the left side of the main entrance while a small cafe was in the opposite. In the auditorium, visitors faced the stage and media behind, while storage was placed in the left side of the building.
However, in 2012, the offices are planned to be separated into two rooms located in a diagonal corner of a lobby, while, the cafe will be turned into restaurants. In the right corner of the auditorium, showers will be constructed. The stage is designed larger with a small hall at the backstage, and as a result, old storage will be moved to the left and replaced by media.
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Despite better access to education many adults today still cannot read or write In what ways are they disadvantaged What can governments do to help them 80
- Many countries have compulsory military service for men after they leave school It would be a good idea to adopt this system for men and possibly women To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 85
- The table shows the export values of various products in 2009 and 2010
- Many elderly are no long looked after by their families but are put in care homes or nursing homes What are the advantages and disadvantages 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, regarding, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68072289157 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57367136476 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560240963855 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5146334919 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201779562362 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913655690939 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118225734933 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133706543413 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130806138271 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, regarding, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68072289157 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57367136476 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560240963855 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5146334919 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201779562362 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913655690939 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118225734933 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133706543413 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130806138271 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.