In recent times, the media and its offshoots are playing a vital role in everyone’s life. Because of which, there is a widespread criticism that states the role of advertisements being telecasted in television or shared in any of the social media seems to be demoralising and carry little benefits. While I concede to this belief about the maligning impacts of commercials, I have some reservations in completely banning those.
To begin with, we have been acclimated to watching advertisements since more than 3 decades. Interestingly, the role of media has become enormously aggressive such that most of the times it annoys people when they are watching any interesting content on television or in any electronic gadgets. For example, there are multiple brands of shampoos and hair dyes being endorsed by various film fraternities. It is a regrettable fact that being a social icon, the celebrities support such products without assessing the ill nature of the additives present. Furthermore, when people start to use these products, it leads to skin irritation and rashes instead of giving the promised outcomes.
Having said that, are advertisements really behove to the benefit of people? If it does so, it would not need any sort of endorsement to be made in the media. For example, there are no such posters made for buying food from any established food outlets such as McDonalds or KFC. Therefore, people should not fall into the trap of buying those advertised products without weighing their health or skin compatibility with those chemicals. However, if any, of the products are supported by the government or any civic societies, then we can buy those products after careful consideration.
To recapitulate, advertisements are made only to reap revenues by hoodwinking unbelievable benefits to the layman. It is our imperative responsibility to examine the advertisements before deciding whether to buy the product or not. Therefore, I agree that advertisements are always deceptive to consumers and people should not fall into their traps.
- Scientists believe that in the near future cars will be driven by computers What are the reasons behind it Would it be a positive or negative development in your opinion 61
- Many people believe that cycling is a healthy and environmentally friendly mode of transport However it is still unpopular in many countries What are the reasons What could be done to encourage the use of bicycles among wider population 61
- The difference in age between parents and their children has increased compared to the past Do you think advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Nowadays more people are choosing to live with their friends or alone rather than with their families this trend is likely to have a negative impact on community To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 587, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e products after careful consideration. To recapitulate, advertisements are made...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, really, so, then, therefore, while, for example, sort of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27659574468 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14590987178 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589665653495 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9369712314 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12382659621 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430203395578 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498650569636 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786841316419 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286527452546 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.