A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material
possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem
important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
As the world grows more and more briskly, it is crucial to be have a specific position and to have self-enjoyment. However, those cannot and never be the measure to evaluate a personal value. I totally disagree with the statement that, “People are judged only according to social status and material. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important”.
To begin with, social status and material ownerships – from my standpoint, can never be put on measurement to any personal evaluation. Who can clarify that one’s status was made from his/her own achievements, or from some vague reasons? As also with material owning, we cannot respect one just because he/she is wearing a luxurious shoes – because nobody knows whether that possesion belongs to that person, or whether the owner had to spend months of his/her salary to purchase that goods?
Moreover, I think that personal characteristics’ values, for instance honour, kindness and trust – given by the topic, are definite the exact qualification to assess anyone. Ones can fake their fortune, their positions but cannot fake their traits. With natural instinct, we can to some extent analyze the honest of the person we meet. And it is undeniable that we would communicate with person with good feature and no property rather than one who has tremendous assets but poor manner.
In conclusion, the inside trait of everyone is the definite object to assess oneself. As long as one’s trait is qualified, we can make relationship, no matter how much is their fortune. With good characteristics, admirable social position or good property will be gained by time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-23 | Hanh Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2017-01-23 | Hanh Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2016-07-23 | Tamara | 73 | view |
| 2015-03-11 | yaya | 60 | view |
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of thesociety in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Thbar chart shows active participation rates in top ten sports in 1998 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 67
- Some say that because many people are living much longer, the age at which people retire from work should beraised considerably.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and materialpossessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seemimportant.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- As children become adults, their social behaviour changes in some ways.What are the main differences between young children’s social behaviour and that of adults? To what extent are thechanges that take place good?Give reasons for your answer and includ 29
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 338, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'shoe'?
Suggestion: shoe
...t because he/she is wearing a luxurious shoes – because nobody knows whether that pos...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21402214022 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0047778115 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59778597786 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5686399869 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.928571429 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269059080905 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984482777792 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108339212648 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166741355348 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108686618952 0.056905535591 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.