At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
These days, many countries are having a young population that raising questions about the future of these countries. Some people have the idea that there are more benefits than drawbacks can cause.
Many individuals believe that lack of old people can lead to the shortage of experience in many fields of work. Most of the elders have been through a lot of obstacles in life more than the young ones. For example, a senior worker can speed up the process of work more than a freshman because they already familiar with their work and increase their work pace by using the tips that they innovated throughout the work. Therefore, old people can show young individuals better solutions to many problems because they have experienced it.
On the other hand, the young force can help their countries in many ways. First, they can contribute to their countries with innovated knowledge from others by studying aboard, experience in many places then bring great things to develop their countries. Second, young ones often have creative mind set that can invent something never exist before. Moreover, new paths of thinking from young people’s perspective may improve the living standards of their countries. Finally, the young have much more energy than old ones which can help them to complete many tasks. For instance, youngsters can work longer and less errors than elders because their mental and physical strength are both high.
In conclusion, young population that occur in many countries is not a downside for these countries. In fact, the young generation are help their countries in many ways such as nutrition countries with their new knowledge and upgrade the living standard of people by providing with new paths of thinking.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | venkatesh1018 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | aria etemadi | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Lucre96 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | Lauriel | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | green1222 | 89 | view |
- The qualities and skills that a person requires to become successful in today's world cannot be learned at a university or other academic institutions. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The money spent by governments on space programmes would be better spent on vital public services such as schools and hospitals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- These days some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events Do you think this is a positive or negative development 60
- Today much of the food people eat gets transported from farms that are thousands of miles away. Some people believe it would be better for the environment and the economy if people only consumed food produced by local farmers. Would the advantages of this 73
- Nowadays adults do little exercise Some people believe that the best way to address this issue is by covering great sports events such as the Olympics on television Others think that it is more beneficial to take other measures What is your opinion 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 617, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun errors is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...nstance, youngsters can work longer and less errors than elders because their mental...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13986013986 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46211700528 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520979020979 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2260904774 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0899870290806 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420107401512 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333247663729 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0754736360584 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380860355313 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.