With the pressures on today’s young people to succeed academically, some people believe that non-academic subjects at school should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Over the past decades, what subjects that young students should learn at school has never failed to draw public attention and provoke debates. Some people claim that school should cut out all non-academic subjects to give children more time to concentrate on academic subjects. However, I believe that the combination of non-academic subjects and academic subjects will benefit students more than focussing only one kind of them.
There are many reasons to include non-academic subjects in the curriculum. Firstly, non-academic subjects will provide many practical skills, which enable students to have a good grasp of life. For instance, enrolling cookery class will help teenagers familiar with the kitchen and all the tools so that it is easier for them to take care of themselves in term of cooking when they live far from their family. Also, learning these subjects is essential for the overall development of children and allow finding out talents. Those that join an arts-related class could potentially become writers, poets or playwrights, for example, and thus contribute to society in a cultural form.
Admittedly, there is the point that knowledge gained from the academic subject is more likely valuable to prepare for the competitive job market. Normally, people with broad knowledge will have more opportunities to gain success. The more time students spend to focus on academic subjects the more chances they will get better degrees when they are graduated from universities. As a result, they will easily find a good job with many promotions on their work. However, we must admit that there are many people are having success without academically minded.
To sum up, there is no point is eliminating non-academic subjects from the syllabus. In my opinion, to form the best education system, we should provide students with a variety of topics in the curriculum, which are academic subjects and non-academic too.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-11 | nakun11 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | anhoanguyenquin | 89 | view |
- With the pressures on today s young people to succeed academically some people believe that non academic subjects at school should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects To what extent do you agree or dis 89
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? 84
- Internet when used as a source of information, has more drawbacks than advantages. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 78
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? 78
- Topic 9: It is generally acknowledged that families are now not as close as they used to be. Give possible reasons and your recommendations. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Over the past decades, what subjects tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, kind of, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33116883117 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75648394595 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2549343223 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.466666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308915124634 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11598285516 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838431809298 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207901125966 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904773426846 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.