The proliferation of private cars on the roads in many parts of the world has led to serious problems of pollution and may contribute to global warming. Some people think that governments should spend money for the development of public transportation systems in order to help alleviate this problem. Others think it is better to spend money for the development of electric and other types of cars that may cause less pollution.
Do you think it is better for governments to spend money developing public transportation or developing new kinds of cars?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The loom of private cars has been a pressing problem nowadays for it leads to the devastation of the environment. The jury of how to resolve this conundrum is still out. However, people have thought of two solutions: first, the government should join hands to reform existent public transportation systems to allay the issue, second, it's said that the nation had better spend money developing revolutionary electric and other types of vehicles which results in rironental pollutions. In my opinion, I side with the latter, and here're the reasons why.
Firstly, everyone knows frittering away lucre on infrastructure, especially public transportation is simply a short-term resolution. Exhaust fumes emitted from trucks, tractions, motorbikes,... keep soaring, no matter how versatile the new system is. Nothing can assert the disappearance of traffic gridlock and accidents. Not only are these viable to take toll in the quality of life of citizens but they also worsen the conditions of the degraded ozone layers.
Secondly, the upgraded vehicle grid may beget annihilation of vegetation as well, because the trees needs cutting down in order to build more forks, thoroughfares, or boulevards,... so that the development can be realized and metabolized. On the wake of this, the forests, glades, steppes will step-by-step be replaced by more networks of alleyways and highways, indicating the nature is conspicuously and egregiously menaced.
Furthermore, global warming, which has been derived from the contamination of chemical substances, carbonhydrates emissions from buses, taxies,..., is impending as a harbinger of doomsday for Earth. If the former solution is taken into force, it is imperative where the second one be utilized sooner or later to protect the life of all creatures on this planet. Hence, should we take actions earlier, invent reformatory kinds of cars on the dot, less fundings will be squandered, more living organisms are to be conserved.
In conclusion, think tanks of any government should be sober enough to decide which means are for further vision and more promising future for mankind. Before it's too late, we have to be clear first what we have to do to defend our life, we just can't always rely on the leaders anymore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-27 | m_sepahi@ymail.com | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-03 | stanie calitex | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | cindycornelia98 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | cindycornelia98 | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | cindycornelia98 | 56 | view |
- Some people feel that education should be provided exclusively by the state and private education should be prohibited To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experi 84
- Some people think that being able to communicate with others online is breaking down geographical barriers and enabling people who would normally never have the chance to meet to communicate What are the advantages of international communication online Ar 89
- Sample topic Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph shows children by age group as a percentage of the young population in the United Kingdom between 1990 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 89
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100 000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994 98 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period Write a report f 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...itted from trucks, tractions, motorbikes,... keep soaring, no matter how versatile...
^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...more forks, thoroughfares, or boulevards,... so that the development can be realiz...
^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...bonhydrates emissions from buses, taxies,..., is impending as a harbinger of dooms...
^^
Line 7, column 447, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun fundings is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...t reformatory kinds of cars on the dot, less fundings will be squandered, more livin...
^^^^
Line 9, column 247, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... have to do to defend our life, we just cant always rely on the leaders anymore.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, well, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3147632312 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04689032138 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679665738162 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7471601718 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.235294118 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1176470588 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146320959469 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356512288817 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494106837298 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705752530461 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553775469199 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.