In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring? Do you think these changes are positive or negative?
There has been a significant shift in the household structure as compared to the past decade. People tend to form a nuclear family instead of 3 to 4 generations living together under the same roof. I see this phenomenon as an optimistic change on the society overall. I shall share appropriate reasoning with examples to validate my stance in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, previously, a family structure was comprised of one running the financial show in the house, primarily the husband and women of the house is to take care of the house chores and children only. Now with the passage of time and with the development of sense of equality men and women are both earning sharing the financial burden. This is a long lasting positive impact on the family as they with additional earnings parents can save for higher education of their children or can build a house of their dream in their early ages.
To elucidate my stance further, another positive impact of nuclear families is that adolescents adapt to live independently as both the parents are working and busy in their life. Children tend to take their responsibilities in the early stage of their live, preparing them any unforeseen circumstances they may come across in their lives.
To summarize the aforementioned, I would like to reaffirm that family restructuring advantages have definitely outweighed the demerits if may have. This lifestyle is not only good for a family but undoubtedly pose a good impact on the society as a whole.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-08 | nguyenhuynhnhu233 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-07 | mimio5 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | mirsohails | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | mirsohails | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | Amna Zeeshan | 56 | view |
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- 6 You found a piece of lost luggage with someone s belongings labeled with their name and address Write a letter to the owner In your letter describe the luggage you found explain where you found it suggest how the owner could get it back 73
- 4 Some think dangerous extreme sports such as skydiving and rock climbing should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- 5 It has been suggested that all young adults should be required to undertake unpaid work helping people in the community Would the drawbacks of such a requirement be greater than the benefits to the community and the individual young adults 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 47, Rule ID: WAS_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprised' or 'consisted of' or 'was composed of'?
Suggestion: comprised; consisted of; was composed of
...in with, previously, a family structure was comprised of one running the financial show in the h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... good impact on the society as a whole.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94117647059 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90430747724 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580392156863 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7014665866 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.545454545 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126942122991 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471877688426 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348893147435 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0742220635487 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254304172472 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.