In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring? Do you think these changes are positive or negative?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In the recent times there is a drastic change within the institute of family all over the world. Some changes are for the betterment of the society whereas few are debatable. This essay is going to shed some light on few of the changes along with their positive and negative consequences.
There are many changes within the modern family, one of which is emphasis on working female members. For example, the percentage of female population that is considered with in the working class today is far more than that was in the 19th century. This alteration is definitely considered to be positive in nature as it has seeded the modern values within the community. Another change seen in the todays family is better financial literacy among every person of different age group . Even the adolescent person in the family has better knowledge of handling money which was not the case in earlier times. This empowered modern family to be stable during the various financial crisis which world has seen overtime.
Although, society is moving ahead with accepting these changes in family roles and structure, there are other changes which have negative ramification to the community. For instance, the number of family members has drastically reduced over the past decade. There might be adverse effects on the economy in the long run as there will be lesser work force available at the global level due to the reduction in family member count. Another change that we can see in todays era is the concept of nuclear family. This idea was a result of younger generation's need of independence by not staying with their old parents. The need of freedom has somewhat negatively impacted the community, as the young generation is not taking care of their dependent parents by staying with them.
At the end, after discussion on various changes that are happening in the family structure and roles we can say some of them are progressive in nature whereas few are having negative impact.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-21 | mirsohails | 73 | view |
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles What are the changes occurring Do you think these changes are positive or negative Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experienc 73
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles What are the changes occurring Do you think these changes are positive or negative Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experienc 73
- Some people believe that we cannot learn anything from the past for our life today while others believe that history is a valuable source of information to understand human s life Discuss both views and give your opinion Give reasons for your answer and i 67
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people Do you agree or disagree 67
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...e community. Another change seen in the todays family is better financial literacy amo...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 483, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...mong every person of different age group . Even the adolescent person in the famil...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94894894895 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51613887867 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522522522523 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.553828023 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8125 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247170546811 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862217652617 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636511644479 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166386131076 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359719930671 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.