In recent years, there has been growing interest in the relationship between equality and personal achievement. Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies. Others believe that high levels of personal achievement are possible only if individuals are free to succeed or fail according to their individual merits.
What is your view of the relationship between equality and personal success?
While some people think that a society with equal rights will make individuals achieve success, others feel that success depends on self-worth. This essay opines that both these elements are required in order to fulfil one’s goals and ambitions.
To begin with the important with of equal rights, an egalitarian society facilitates people to pursue their goals regardless of their gender. For example, most of the western countries believe in equality when it comes to pursue individual goals, such as Australia, France, America, and this freedom of pursuing dreams and ambitions without gender discrimination provides people the impetus to fulfil their ambitions. Thus, in an egalitarian community individuals are more likely to achieve success as compared to other nations.
However, providing equal opportunities to people will not make them successful; self-worth is also of identical important. The reason for this is simple, even if government provides ample job prospects to its citizens, only proficient candidates would secure a job. As an old saying, success is where an opportunity and preparation meet, so only giving equal rights will not make individuals successful. Traits such as hard work, perseverance and aptitude matters too. For instance, Thomas Edison, inventor of the light bulb, failed almost one thousand times before inventing the perfect bulb. Therefore, self-worth is equally important when it comes to attain success.
To conclude, a society without discriminations may provide equal chances of success to its people; however, unless the people have perseverance and the motivation to achieve their goals, success is not likely to happen. An amalgamation both these elements are instrumental in achieving individual goals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | sivasankar | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-05 | phanduydat | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-08 | tahmeed2019 | 56 | view |
| 2018-12-10 | Bharat Goswami | 78 | view |
| 2018-05-21 | rahulper90 | 78 | view |
- There seems to be an increasing trend towards assessing students through exams rather than through continual assessment What are the advantages and disadvantages of exams as a form of assessment 91
- Some people think that the employees who have been working with the company for a longer time should only be promoted. What is your opinion? 84
- Employers should give longer holidays to employees to encourage them to do their job well Do you agree 100
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.Dis 73
- Computers are being used more and more in education. Some people say that this is a positive trend, while others argue that it is leading to negative consequences. Discuss both sides of this argument and then give your own opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 453, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'individual'?
Suggestion: individual
...ions. Thus, in an egalitarian community individuals are more likely to achieve success as c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64661654135 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89941034707 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593984962406 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3971139743 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.538461538 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161370899165 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609729955529 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580319510558 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110263856666 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428803912271 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.