A suggestion of research is widely concerned about a situation in which a host of prisoners will commit wrongdoings after being released. I believe this problem is due to the lack of proper education and stricter rules. This essay will first give plausible explanations for this situation, and then demonstrate reasonable solutions to address this.
Because criminals are not well-educated, a higher rate of reoffending can be seen in society. First of all, a shortage of education can easily lead prisoners into a bad habit of committing a crime. In other words, an appropriate lesson about the danger of wrongdoings should be delivered to detach wrongdoers from recommitting crimes as well as promoting their attitudes and behaviors towards the community. Taking Vietnam as a prime example, by adopting the educational method, Vietnam has experienced a significant decrease in crime rate, from 78% to 45%, since 2018.
On top of that, not having enough stricter rules can result in a greater crime rate. This is because wrongdoers enable to take advantage of this opportunity to commit a crime without noticing the final consequences. Therefore, heavy punishments like the permanent prisoning, death penalty, or financial ban should be globally applied rather than prisoning them for years to control the increase in the recommitting rate. For instance, Japanese crime situations had gradually dropped by 34% thanks to many heavier penalties for three years.
In conclusion, a shortage of qualified education and heavy punishments are the major reasons lead to an increase in crime rate. Thus, by adjusting these two obstacles, former prisoners will not return to their criminal lifestyles.
- The table below gives information about the values NZ of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 78
- Task 2 The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 89
- The table below gives information about the underground railway system in six cities 78
- The bar chart below shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman. 73
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...many heavier penalties for three years. In conclusion, a shortage of qualified e...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, in other words, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3984962406 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01049664606 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.487096237 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.461538462 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209036754255 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740752474578 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377246974712 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123082989666 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281419664772 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.