The increasing number of people taking flights is mainly attributable to the continuous growth in tourism. The environment is being eroded as a result, as now can be outlined with some appropriate examples, together with some pragmatic solutions.
As more and more people choose to travel by air, global warming is exacerbated. It has been calculated that aviation made up more than 2% of the total Co2 emissions on Earth. To exemplify, water vapor trails from aircraft at high altitudes- which create an often-invisible thermal blanket of cloud in the troposphere, contribute significantly to global warming as they trap the heat radiating from the earth’s surface, causing warming in the air below. Also, most contemporary airplanes are running on dirty fuel like jet gasoline- which is converted to Co2 when burned, do not only result in a steady rise in the global temperature by trapping heat, but also indirectly contribute to ozone depletion. To be more specific, Co3 has the capacity to cool air in the stratospheric layer.
Imposing more taxes, especially on frequent fliers, may curb the escalating global warming crisis caused by aviation. One feasible method is to introduce Frequent Flier Levy- a progressive tax that increases as a person takes more trips or travels longer distances by air. It is designed so as not to penalize families that take the one annual holiday but instead, concentrate on a small fraction of the global population that take regular flights. Besides, a paradigm shift to environmentally friendly airplanes is worth considering. If more electricity, biofuels or other sustainable energy is consumed in the aviation industry, less fumes will be emitted, compared to their gasoline counterpart. As a result, the atmospheric warming impacts by jets may be less severe.
To conclude, air travel has tremendous impacts on the global temperature, both in terms of co2 and non-co2. Levied people who take more flights than others mandating the use of sustainable fuels may effectively ameliorate the problems.
- Students are becoming more and more reliant on the internet While the internet is convenient it has many negative effects and its use for educational purposes should be restricted How far do you agree with this statement 56
- More and more newspapers and news channels are using photographs to support their news articles and stories Some people think photographs are not a reliable source of news while others consider photographs to be irrefutable Discuss both sides and give you 84
- Most people think that truth should be objective rather than subjective when it comes to news Do you think all news true What is the function of newspaper 95
- Most people think that truth should be objective rather than subjective when it comes to news Do you think all news true What is the function of newspaper 89
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife while there are other problems that are more important Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 631, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun fumes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...y is consumed in the aviation industry, less fumes will be emitted, compared to thei...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, may, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3036809816 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03498891929 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61963190184 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1500540058 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.266666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.93333333333 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152865864944 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562621513675 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485939575858 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101029787741 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418229102511 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.