The role of humour in curing illnesses
Throughout centuries, humour has been considered as an entertainment tool and indicator of emotional satisfaction. Moreover, scientific evidences have been researched in order to discover extra functions of laughter in human life, especially in terms of medicine. Consequently, these surveys have been resulting in changing individuals’ position and making them clear on this topic.
There are two types of humour: adaptive and maladaptive, which are controversial to one another. Adaptive humor is self-enhancing and motivates patients to struggle with diseases, while maladaptive humour is self- defeating that people suffer more (Kuiper et al., 2006). Maladaptive humour could be avoided by training a staff about the scientific nature of humour and its role. As a result this tool could serve as an appropriate assistance. On the other hand, the effect of humour is a question of how people respond to this.
Humour is an integral part of the treatment. It is usually used in the treatment of depressed patients, especially if they are concerned about the consequences of the disease. The time required for treatment was reduced due to the use of comic stories. According to Christie et al., (2005), “measurements of specific neuroendocrine and stress hormone levels revealed biochemical changes that suggested improved physical stress responses and increased feelings of well-being after humorous interventions”.
Thus, humour is a bridge between patients and medical personnel, which strengthens passion and believes in a healthy future. There are many unknown things about humour that needs discovery as this has vital attitude in easing not only treatment process, but also other aspects of life. However, “we really know very little about how the brain functions in response to a humorous stimulus” (Mary and Cecile, 2006, p.62).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-13 | buahkiwienak | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-11 | tr_h.20 | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-04 | Dangdang | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-25 | quinnispractisingielts | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-25 | quinnispractisingielts | 73 | view |
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree? 61
- The role of humour in curing illnesses 84
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree? 56
- The role of humour in curing illnesses 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, really, so, then, thus, well, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62765957447 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24244002768 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645390070922 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2018149296 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.8 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154044200694 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560936008147 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067098850681 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856942661174 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659929803938 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.