For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree
The process of educating children has been recently becoming more significant than the past, as the role of teachers and parents profoundly influence on forming behavior and characteristic aspects. A proportion states that the impact of teachers is superior to that of parents. Personally, a sharply disagreement is my point of view which is clarified in this given essay.
Firstly, the children are affected directly by parents through the foundation of family and genetic factors. In detail, the Intelligence quotient of child has a important probability of conveying from their parents and decides the progress of reflecting objects. Additionally, the routine activities, parents usually do in a day, can be allowed by children, leading to the replication of behavior and logical thinking. Both factors are generally heritage to form as a foundation. As a result, because of living under one roof, children are certainly influenced by parents during the process of reaching majority.
Secondly, the development of children social occurs both in school, family, and living environment. In detail, by applying professional educating approaches, teachers can use lessons for teaching and training hard skills. Moreover, in school, students are provided with most types of educational equipment which is completely ready for studiers to translate theory into practice under guidance of teachers. Additionally, children can communicate with others to form some initial social connections. Consequently, based on given abilities, children stand a good chance of enchanting knowledge, along with the lecture of teachers.
To conclusion, the impact of teachers and parents is equally significant, and both of parties possess each specifically strong positions. However, the existence of another outside factors, such as society, also contribute a massive domination to the development of children.
- Individual actions have little or no effect on climate change For this reason worthwhile change can only be made at governmental level To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of one international organisation rater than ech national government. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 73
- Some people believe that Young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('sharply') instead an adjective, or a noun ('disagreement') instead of another adjective.
...uperior to that of parents. Personally, a sharply disagreement is my point of view which is clarified ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... the Intelligence quotient of child has a important probability of conveying from...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74468085106 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13919328493 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602836879433 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6223975185 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215131789323 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592609151313 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416809099484 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107284029472 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027003266602 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.