For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and
social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that school children are at an impressionable age, and two strong
influences on their intelligence and social development are teachers and
parents. While I accept that teachers may have more influence on the intelligence
of their pupils, I would argue that parents probably exert a greaterinfluence on the
social development of their children.
In terms of encouraging the intellectual development and stimulating the intelligence
of school children, I believe that teachers play the major role. While not all teachers
are capable of inspiring their students, they are trained to impart their knowledge of
their subject areas in challenging and imaginative ways. For example, some
students owe their lifelong love of a subject to dedicated teachers who taught
this discipline in secondary school. Of course, at home parents may
also reinforce this passion by
encouraging study habits during the formative years of their children. Such support
is vital for academic achievement.
From the perspective of social development, I think that parents are mainly
responsible for guiding their children. Firstly, they spend far more time with their
children than any individual teacher is able to do. They can therefore monitor the
activities of children outside school hours, at weekends and during
holidays. Secondly, parents are able to provide role models in a whole range of
situations. These might include showing respect towardselders, choice of friends, or
proper behaviour in public when eating out in restaurants.
In conclusion, although teachers probably have a greater effect in stimulating the
intelligence of school children, parental influences on the development of children
are stronger in social situations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | chips_0506 | 87 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | doquytuan | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | doquytuan | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-21 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
- The diagram below shows how to recycle organic waste to produce fertiliser compost Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below gives information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 95
- Many people say that we have developed into a throw away society because we are filling up our environment with so many plastic bags and rubbish that we cannot fully dispose of To want degree do you agree with this opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, of course, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71212121212 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10523825034 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2617932842 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 24.0 4.38176352705 548% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.544183549456 0.244688304435 222% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186891556036 0.084324248473 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128415255376 0.0667982634062 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146066734218 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13360247636 0.056905535591 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.