For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a fact that excellent, knowledgeable and experienced teachers will help students to do well in academic learning. However, their parents also have important roles in teaching them. I personally disagree that parents have less influence on their children's intelligence and social development than teachers and the essay will discuss about my view.
To begin with, parents are their children's primary care givers and will spend many times with their children; therefore, children will have more chances to learn from them automatically. During school time, children go to school to obtain knowledge by learning different kinds of subjects; however, what they learn are all from text books or labs and after school, parents are their mentors in their daily lives and teach their children a variety of thinking skills. For example, children with good parents' support and guiding will do better at schools and have good careers in their future. Moreover, high intelligence is inherited by genes from parents.
In addition, children's social development includes many contents, such as interpersonal skills, communication skills, and so on. It is definite that teachers will help their students to practice their communication skills via a variety of activities in classes; however, it takes long time for children to master social skills. Children have been learning these skills since they were born. Their parents are their first teachers. For instance, researches indicate that children whose parents talked to them more in infant time will have better communication skills. These children tend to have better capacity of expressing themselves.
In conclusion, at school teachers convey many knowledges and all kinds of skills to their students; however, parents pass more knowledges to their children during their lives and teach their children to master social skills. Parents play a more important role in influencing their children to become smarter and more competent than teachers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | chips_0506 | 87 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | doquytuan | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | doquytuan | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-21 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
- The charts below show the number of people in Europe who were affected by four types of noise by day and by night in cities and rural areas in 2007 82
- Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment 73
- The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies than on positive developments is harmful to the individuals and the society as a whole To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Museums and art galleries should show local history and culture instead of work from different countries 61
- Many university students live with their families while others live away from home because their universities are in different places Do you think the advantages of living with their families outweigh the disadvantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by genes from parents. In addition, childrens social development includes ma...
^^
Line 7, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...master social skills. Children have been learning these skills since they were bo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51298701299 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71022812355 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503246753247 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.0481305985 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.2 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.548278028438 0.244688304435 224% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.209759472957 0.084324248473 249% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123935261269 0.0667982634062 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.386581014672 0.151304729494 255% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496505245859 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.