For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a controversial notion heating a debate that school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. While some people believe that teachers have a greater effect over children's growth, I consider that both teachers and parents play crucial roles in shaping a child's development.
On the one hand, there are clear arguments that highlight the significant influence of teachers on students. One of the main reasons can be that teachers have knowledge in various subjects, allowing them to provide valuable insights and create a conducive learning environment that promotes critical thinking among students. For this reason, students often look up to their teachers as mentors and role models. Take the case of some students who own their lifelong love of a subject to dedicated teachers who taught this discipline in secondary school. Another possible merit can be that teachers could work with students in contacting different cultures and standpoints. Not only can teachers help students develop understanding, but they can also promote inclusivity within the classroom.
On the other hand, I am of the belief that parents also play an important role in their child's growth. Firstly, I concur that parents provide emotional support and love, which are indispensable for a child's development. The reason for my conviction is that the raising environment created by parents helps build a solid foundation for a child's intellectual and social development that may not always be possible in a classroom setting. Secondly, I would contend that parents have a deep understanding of their child's strengths, weaknesses, and interests, allowing them to tailor their support accordingly. As a result, the combination of teachers' expertise and parents' personalized care leads to better growth.
In conclusion, while some may agree with the idea that teachers hold more influence over school children's intelligence and social development than parents, I totally concur that both teachers and parents play vital roles in shaping a child's growth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | chips_0506 | 87 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | doquytuan | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | doquytuan | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-21 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
- Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment 81
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant Write at least 150 words 89
- The charts below show the percentages of the water used in different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 73
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your own opinion 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46932515337 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91626817113 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521472392638 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7566322019 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.357142857 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412453900443 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144984257835 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141527876302 0.0667982634062 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285094614105 0.151304729494 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115259333205 0.056905535591 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.