Science tells us about activities which are good for our health and others which are bad. Millions of people all over the world knows this and still do unhealthy activities. Why do you think this is and what can be done to change it?
I strongly advocate the saying, "All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy." In today's world we see many Jack's that behave ignorant towards healthy practices in their day to day lives. Science has been proactively creating awareness about well being of individuals. We will discuss on reasons and measures to mitigate the adverse repurcussions of unhealthy lifestyle.
Nowadays, people are inclined towards sedantry living. Long sitting hours at work have resulted in negative physical development. Inappropriate time management leaves a little space for people to work for their own fitness. Increased population has resulted in congestion. Moreover, unsafe neighbourhood has also caused people to stay indoors. Exposure to online gaming zones has caused a diminish in outdoor activities. With relevance to market competition current schooling curriculum ponders more upon professional development versus physical enhancement.
A shift to healthy practices requires a cultural change from the notion of lack of availability of time to effective utilisation of time. Schooling agendas should consider physical development equally imperative to qulaification based roles. Employers can promote healthy living during work hours by implementing concepts such as desk yoga, fun hour, fast food at high prices and nourished based food at subsidised prices. Employees can be encouraged to use car pooling or cycle at work. Statiscal reports prove a healthy employee can contribute more towards organisation's growth. Among children usage of computers should be regulated and they should be encouraged for outdoor activities. CCTV's should be installed as safety and security measure. Unhealthy eating habits should be monitored.
Inculcating a habit of healthy living can boost overall progression of individuals and the nation. Institutions and organisations can be mandated to promote and implement activities towards non sedantry living
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-01 | Witzbolder | 61 | view |
| 2018-06-17 | Sgms | 84 | view |
| 2018-04-27 | bryanfigueras | 84 | view |
| 2018-04-03 | Bilegsaikhan | 84 | view |
- Science tells us about activities which are good for our health and others which are bad. Millions of people all over the world knows this and still do unhealthy activities. Why do you think this is and what can be done to change it? 84
- Team sports are generally promoted as a great way to keep fit and build character. However, sporting events such as soccer matches are often accompanied by violence between rival supporters and other forms of antisocial behaviour. If sporting events cause 77
- Do you think that the English language will remain the global language of business despite globalization? Support your point of view with examples and observations. 55
- Global climate change is a serious issue, like the greenhouse effect. Who has the main responsibility to take action to prevent this change? Government, large corporation or individuals? And explain why? 80
- Some people get famous at a young age. Is its a good or a bad thing? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 387, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...osure to online gaming zones has caused a diminish in outdoor activities. With relevance t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8041958042 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05231738202 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664335664336 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8572452636 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 7.06120827912 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115071908886 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347214534772 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284646006117 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0657833860269 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0097889213238 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.77 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.