scientific research should be funded by government rather than commercial organisation to what extent do you agree or disagree?
Scientific researches are often costly and conducted in long terms, therefore some commentators have stated that private enterprises should be responsible for carrying out and monitoring these kinds of research. While this may have some certain benefits, I would argue that these trivial merits are outweighed by enormous disadvantages.
On the one hand, private companies respond more rapidly to demand than governments do. Unlike government subsidies, which are divided into countless portions aiming at various social beneficiaries, the available and plentiful funds of private firms can easily support scientists promptly according to demands. For example, during the outbreak of Covid-19 recently, Vingroup corporation has mobilized resources to manufacture mechanical ventilators and temperature monitoring devices for Vietnamese people. The group also sponsored 20 billion Vietnam Dong for the clinical test of made in Vietnam vaccine called COVIVAC.
On the other hand, there are significant benefits if governments determine the direction of scientific research for the well-being of their people. Firstly, a government is definitely more sustainable than a company, resulting in more stable funds for researches. A private enterprise may declare bankruptcy, which will terribly affect on-going studies depending totally on it. Besides, an ultimate goal of firms is profit, therefore, if a specific investigation costing a large amount of money yet seems fruitless to them, they may abandon the whole project. Secondly, the government can ensure legal and less harmful researches for the society. Private companies while pursuing profit may ignore consequences to the environment such as discharging unprocessed industrial waste, or take illegal actions such as avoid paying taxes. These activities will lead to environmental degradation, which negatively affect dwellers’ health as well as social welfare. Government, under the pressure of taking conscientious care for its residents, would not allow those activities to happen.
In conclusion, although scientific researches funded by private companies gain advantages from available money resource, placing the responsibility for scientific research in government hands far outweigh the aforementioned merits.
- The manufacturing and use of cars damages the environment but their popularity is increasing Why is this How could this be controlled 89
- The internet means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many countries import large amounts of food from other parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 61
- In many counties more and more women have full time jobs as men There is a logic that they should share the housework equally with men To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people say that outdoor activities bring benefits to children s development rather than computer games To what extent do you agree disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: ON-GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
... bankruptcy, which will terribly affect on-going studies depending totally on it. Beside...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1953.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 6.02777777778 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10563616583 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675925925926 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4732205213 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.2 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0666666667 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166905832984 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563425795575 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654966566653 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111590764412 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346464404836 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.69 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.16 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.