Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
People's opinion as to whether or not governments should allocate public money in saving languages that are spoken by very small number of people. I will discuss both views but personally, I believe that the it is necessary for the governments to support these languages.
On the one hand, it is often believed that investing in saving these languages is a waste of money because there are more important things that are worth being taken care of, such as education or environment. For example, in many developing countries like Vietnam, an average of 50 students are jammed into a classroom, which would be difficult for a teacher to take good care for all of them. As regards environmental problems, pollution is a real challenge for most of the developing countries. For instance, worse air quality in Hanoi is the main cause of many disease relating to lungs.
On the other hand, I am of the opinion that endangered languages should be preserved in order to maintain culture diversity. Languages are backbone of a region as they probably represent culture identity. If they disappear, the distinctiveness of that culture will be lose, reducing culture diversity. Furthermore, a number of ancient documents are written in rare languages. Losing a language means that less chance for scientists to discover and decode these documents.
In conclusion, although both views certainly have some validity, it seems to me that protect uncommon languages is beneficial as they allow us to preserve culture identity as well as ancient documents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-14 | hoaithuongnguyen | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 61 | view |
| 2023-05-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | Hanabi | 56 | view |
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 75
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 89
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 73
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 73
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: WHETHER[4]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; whether or not; as to whether
Peoples opinion as to whether or not governments should allocate public mone...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...th views but personally, I believe that the it is necessary for the governments to sup...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 561, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun disease seems to be countable; consider using: 'many diseases'.
Suggestion: many diseases
...r quality in Hanoi is the main cause of many disease relating to lungs. On the other hand...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e identity as well as ancient documents.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, well, as regards, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19123505976 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96112706912 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605577689243 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3573102359 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.454545455 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9090909091 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328805824247 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105919083357 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118274520711 0.0667982634062 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198454046077 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134118242444 0.056905535591 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.