Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
These days, several languages are in risk of disappearing since they are spoken by minorities. The way I see it, there is a suggestion that local authorities should spend money on saving these languages while others think that is a waste of money. I am in favour of the first opinion and I shall address both in this essay.
For a variety of reasons, saving these minor languages can be seen as a financial waste. First and foremost, these languages are only spoken by a small section of society. Therefore, investing large sums of money in expensive education programs may be a highly risk investment. Especially, local authorities will cover expenses including facilities, mentors and marketing with taxes from the residents. This amount of money should be invested more in public services for them more than languages that are not widely spoken. Furthermore, if these initiatives are implemented, linguistic barriers will be created among residents of a nation, which will have more drawbacks than advantages.
However, I have a strong preference for investing money in these language-saving programs. Not only do these languages serve communicative functions, but they also contain historical worth. With their extended life spans, it is mainly by these minor languages that archeologists can do research about out human evolution process. A language is the soul of a nation. If that language disappears, the soul of that ethnicity no longer remains. That extinction more likely lead to despair than satisfaction for the cultural diversity.
In conclusion, I have long held the deep-seated belief that it is not a misusing of funds to preserve minor languages, which are directly associated with cultural value. Needless to say, it is our duty to safeguard these values, as well as feeling content with them rather than ignoring their disappearance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-14 | hoaithuongnguyen | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 61 | view |
| 2023-05-09 | hoaithuongnguyen | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | Hanabi | 56 | view |
- Families who send their children to private schools should not berequired to pay taxes that support the state education system 61
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles Do you think these changes are positive or negative 84
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems What are those problems In order to reduce the problems should we discourage people from using cars 89
- Obesity is becoming a serious problem in many countries Explain the main cause and solutions of this problem 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I shall address both in this essay. For a variety of reasons, saving these m...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('highly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('risk') instead of another adjective.
... in expensive education programs may be a highly risk investment. Especially, local authoriti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have more drawbacks than advantages. However, I have a strong preference for ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...faction for the cultural diversity. In conclusion, I have long held the deep...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25167785235 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97510995119 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58389261745 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7459389975 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0588235294 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5294117647 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311994602618 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101464158992 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839399590339 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188985667743 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110387634263 0.056905535591 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.