Shops should not be allowed to sell any food or drinks that have been scientifically proven to be bad for people’s health. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Nowadays, both foods and drinks having been verified to endanger societies’ health should strictly be unacceptable at any shops. I, personally, state the same perspective of this issue for the reasonable points, which will be deliberated in this following essay.
On the one side, one of the main reasons allowing variant snacks is that it can be more mouth-watering to purchase for dietary intake. Together with hectic schedules, those who prefer takeaway service prioritize to consume instant-processed foods which drives their appettite most, but low-energy-dense foods. Furthermore, food industries running for confectionary and soft drinks usually contribute the highest taxes to state, due to 24-hour operational supermarket. Apparently, how many customers are interested in such products, particularly young people, will increase stable local economy and national revenue in the long run.
On the flip side, food and beverage with poor-nutrient content consumed by society as the primary source of calories unfortunately suffer heavy consequences. Despite lacking nutrients such as fibre and vitamins, today’s people eat limitless junk foods (burgers and pizzas), containing high levels of fats and sugars which weigh their excessive body even worse diabetes. In addition, the young’s preference on discretionary food aggravates symptoms of mental illnesses which probably bring significant neurotransmitters. This can hamper the signalling of molecule such as dopamine and serotonin (the happy hormones) which afflict depression and other mental disorders.
In conclusion, in my standpoint, unhealthy snacks to be banned are more beneficial outcomes. Such products hold less high-nutrient-source as well as prompt obsessive-compulsive disorder. This is as long as high responsibility of food industries is supervised to pay reasonable taxes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-01 | thaohienpt008 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-08 | Andi Irwan Nur | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-08 | Andi Irwan Nur | 61 | view |
- The table shows the export values of various products in 2009 and 2010
- In some cultures children are encouraged to compete against each other What are the advantages and disadvantages of this approach 84
- In many countries paying for things using mobile phones cellphones apps is becoming increasingly common Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages 89
- People now days send text massages more frequently than they talk the phone What are the reasons for this trend Do the advantages of texting outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The noise level around us is constantly increasing and affecting the quality of our lives What causes the everyday noise that many people face What can be done about it 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, furthermore, if, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97003745318 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45896321018 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.700374531835 0.561755894193 125% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8917895908 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.615384615 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175849910947 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058420432629 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727451890497 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112113131751 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819112181681 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.35 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, furthermore, if, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97003745318 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45896321018 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.700374531835 0.561755894193 125% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8917895908 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.615384615 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175849910947 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058420432629 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727451890497 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112113131751 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819112181681 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.35 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.