Should the international community do more to tackle the threat of global warming?
Global warming has been a solemn problem in recent years. Besides, there is a controversial issue about global organization or national government will deal with the risk of global warming. In my opinion, I completely agree that the international community should take part in tackling the warning of global warming.
Numerous consequences of global warming have been seen obviously. For instance, the acreage of tropical forests is believed to be vulnerable to drought more than ever. Besides, hurricanes and typhoons are now more severe. Not only environment, people’s health are also affected by global warming. It leads to heat-related illnesses and death, and spread of infectious diseases. Therefore, greater efforts should be made to protect inhabitants and environment from global warming.
The effects of global warming impact on not only developed countries but also developing ones therefore, having helps from international organizations is ideal. The first reason is that developing nations are hardly possible to deal with their own problem. Unlike developed states, developing countries nearly cannot afford to buy high-priced equipments or hire seasoned environmentalists, however, with the financial help from international communities, they can make a purchase of equipments as well as experts. Another reason is the low chance of completely solving the problem when a number of politicians use the money which is provided by their government for their own advantages.
In conclusion, it is irresponsible to do nothing about global warming. To solve the problem, international communities are considered to be more believed than the governments on account of those aforementioned reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-10 | wholemilk | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-03 | HeyGungOri | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | astu | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | Nina_OY | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | zhao_kangg | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 to 2004 05 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The flow chart illustrates the consequences of deforestation Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 11
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- The bar chart below shows the employment of all males and females workers by occupation in the UK in the year 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts and environment from global warming. The effects of global warming impact on ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6875 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23138259822 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60546875 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.8298737038 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0666666667 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302651089462 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960216759532 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778502547593 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193748846027 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855591687912 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.