Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth and resources among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizen themselves?
Some people deem that rich countries should help less affluent nations by providing them with money and their assets. While others believe that government of under developing nations should look after their natives by themselves. This essay will bring forth my opinion which inclines former notion. Firstly, it will develop a feeling of brotherhood among countries. Secondly, there will be equal distribution of resources among the sharing countries.
The first and foremost reason is that sharing assets and money will create a feeling of brotherhood among the respective countries which in turn will be beneficial in many ways. For instance, this will bring peace and harmony between those countries and by doing so, these countries will become role models for the rest of the world. It’s one of the best example is China and Pakistan are doing import and export of things which is enhancing the economy and polishing the relations among both countries.
Another reason is that this will lead to equal distribution of resources which will create equal job opportunities for the citizens of both the nations. It is seen that under developing countries usually have large population which creates problem for their government to generate employment opportunities. Further, western countries pay a large sum of money to their people working in online sectors and customer care services. Therefore, affluent countries can set up their online operations or customer care services in these poor nations at less prices. This will benefit both the nations and will bring the talent on the stage.
To conclude, it is imperative that affluent countries should come forward to help the poor nations to bring a feeling of togetherness and to make sure that everyone is getting a bit of the resources the world have.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-06 | Shohista | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-30 | niloya | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-31 | ishanimody | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-21 | sattar_iust | 75 | view |
| 2020-12-20 | vsundar | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that exploring outer space is important because it expands human knowledge and might lead to discoveries that will benefit humanity in the future Other people believe that space exploration is a waste of money that could be better spen 67
- There are many different types of music in the world today Why do we need music Is the traditional music of a country more important than the International music that is heard everywhere nowadays 73
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth and resources among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizen themselves 61
- You ordered a new cheque book from your bank two weeks ago but you have received nothing Write a letter to the manager complaining about the bad service Say when and how you ordered the cheque book Ask how much longer you will have to wait and ask the man 73
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth and resources among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizen themselves 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 545, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun prices is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... care services in these poor nations at less prices. This will benefit both the nati...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21575342466 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61933023502 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517123287671 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3679675826 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.785714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205039097923 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830780649938 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712869672163 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138351741801 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080797931688 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.