Social media and internet
The internet and social media have given increased power to private individuals, online influencers, and organized online groups to make an impact on public impression, reputation, and viability. In fact, this power has grown great enough that it has become possible for such entities to use the web as a platform for dismantling the public standing of celebrities, public office holders, and media figures. This dismantling has been referred to as cancel culture, the act of "cancelling" the visibility, influence, and career of individuals perceived to have acted improperly from their public position. Individuals perceived as guilty of certain offenses—from hateful language or indecent public behavior to sexual assault or other violent crimes—may find themselves at the center of either organic or coordinated online attacks through social media, blog formats, and even through aggressive tactics like doxing (public release of private information) and death threats. The goal is essentially to shame, intimidate and professionally destroy an individual to the end of being "cancelled."
Cancel culture may be seen as a catch-all for movements aimed at capturing social justice by using the tools for campaigning, communication and organization made possible online. For advocates, these tools are seen as ways of being empowered to resist long-standing forms of abuse and prejudice. This is perhaps best demonstrated in the sweeping #MeToo movement, which employed the hashtag to empower women victimized by sexual abuse, sexual assault, and rape to tell their stories. This, in turn, led to revelations of numerous individuals in positions of power who were guilty of such offenses, and in turn, made them among the first notable public figures to be "cancelled." Advocates for various strategies that might be termed "cancel culture" see their actions as redressing historical inequalities and bringing greater accountability to the behavior of individuals in positions of power.
Those who oppose cancel culture may view its tactics as an assault on the right to privacy and a way of trying individuals publicly for offenses without any meaningful "due process." Some critics have likened cancel culture to a witch hunt in which public figures are targeted for various personal, political, and ideological reasons. To its opponents, cancel culture is coordinated internet trolling aimed at destroying reputations and livelihoods without the substantiation of evidence. Some corporate leaders, political figures, and celebrities have expressed concern or fear over meeting what they see as changing expectations of public figures.
At the center of the cancel culture issue is the unrestrained power of groups, organizations, and communities to use their voice both to elevate and dismantle public reputations as well as a shifting understanding of power dynamics and the behavior expected of those in positions of power
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-24 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2024-09-18 | Meomeo11 | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-13 | Tuan Harry | 84 | view |
| 2024-07-16 | MEBC Class | 70 | view |
| 2024-05-28 | thaokim2003 | 67 | view |
- The diagram below show the life of the salmon. 78
- The diagram below show the life of the salmon 84
- Nowadays, celebrities increasingly have status of role models, in particular for younger people 61
- With the increasing use and development of new technology,many machines are now able to do the work which people used to perform 61
- The diagram below show the life of the salmon. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 18, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...f public figures. At the center of the cancel culture issue is the unrestrained power...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, well, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2552.0 1615.20841683 158% => OK
No of words: 445.0 315.596192385 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73483146067 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4013995649 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550561797753 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 801.9 506.74238477 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 10.0 0.809619238477 1235% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.2975951904 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.5439345255 49.4020404114 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 212.666666667 106.682146367 199% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.0833333333 20.7667163134 179% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106335033751 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471206602668 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754066922534 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0568941992867 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677348517506 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.1 13.0946893788 184% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 17.0 50.2224549098 34% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.1 11.3001002004 178% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.55 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 78.4519038076 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.1190380762 166% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.