The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has been argued that a complete restriction on all forms of advertising would bring greater values for society as a whole, due to its apparent lack of useless and sometimes harmfulness. In my view, banning all forms of it could do more harm than good.
On the one hand, to claim that commercials have no use and are detrimental to consumers is completely ill-founded. In the modern world, new products with distinct and revolutionary feature better humans' life and solve problems that happens almost every day. Those products would remain unknown unless advertising the type of information needed to reach as many customers as possible. As a result of advertising, many businesses will thrive, and in turn, pay taxes to the government which will help contribute towards a variety of governmental systems, such as education, healthcare and social security. Such systems help to ensure the well-being of all citizens.
On the other hand, dependency on the advertising industry is inevitable for any nation to prosper. Once commercial experience a ban, unemployment rates would increase and the burden would fall on the state. For example, Coca Cola dispenses thousands of employment opportunities in advertising throughout its branches across different regions around the world. If adverts are forbidden, an unthinkable number of workers, such as marketers, would either move on to other jobs or become unemployed. As a result, government have to provide temporary financial support for those people. In other words, banning any forms of commercial communication would lead to reverse and undesirable implications on society.
In conclusion, it is unreasonable to presume that advertisements are irrelevant and need to be prohibited for the sake of societies best interests.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-07 | tteruchan65 | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | vishal sachdeva | 84 | view |
| 2020-07-20 | solaz1 | 80 | view |
- The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in 4 cities 2000. 61
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 78
- Percentage of different type of waste recycled 73
- The table and graph below give information about cinema attendance in Australia between 1994 and 2002 62
- The pictures show information about average income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a city in the UK 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39784946237 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13030680172 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634408602151 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.211384962 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.571428571 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190468423786 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614477402366 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466048393226 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115601286528 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437467313352 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.