Some cities create housing for their growing population by providing taller buildings. Other cities create housing by building on wider areas of land. Which solution is better?
It is true that national and local authorities have adopted different policies to solve the housing problem in the cities. While many people think that building more apartments would be an effective solution, others prefer to see their city expand. I would argue that the best solution is to expand the city in a planned and organized way.
On the one hand, there are some short-term benefits of constructing towel blocks to provide housing in cities. A city may lack of space to expand for some geographical reason such as coastline, mountains or lakes, therefore tall buildings are the most economical option to satisfy citizen’s need for accommodation. In addition, if more people live in apartments, housing will be more affordable. However, the major drawback is that city districts with dense population may suffer from noise and air pollution since more people result in more vehicles and gas emission.
On the other hand, expansion of a city to provide more housing is probably a better solution. The only problem is such expansion may be not environmentally friendly as it may lead to forest destruction or loss of wildlife when more land is needed for construction. However, if it is conducted in a carefully organized way, the construction of building in the suburbs provides much more pleasant, green and healthy environment for people.
In conclusion, although both solutions have some certain downsides, building on wider area provides better environment to live and start a new life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-17 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-17 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-17 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-17 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-17 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
- Some cities create housing for their growing population by providing taller buildings Other cities create housing by building on wider areas of land Which solution is better 73
- 14 Cars damage the environment and their use is increasing Why How can this be controlled 78
- Society is based on rules and laws It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted to do To what extent do you agree or not 78
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 89
- Some people said that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both view and give your own opinion 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 245.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15510204082 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91148324637 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0100643933 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.818181818 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31900955222 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118963165328 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665504656386 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194541927939 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0106084429704 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.