Some companies sponsor sport and sports stars as a way to advertise themselves. Some people think it is good, while others think there are disadvantages. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is true that increasingly companies advertise themselves via sport and athletes. While many people believe that this strategy can bring several merits to companies, I align with those who think it is likely more harmful impacts than beneficial ones.
On the one hand, this way of advertisement can enhance companies in terms of reputation as well as profit. Initially, sponsoring atletes through postcards or billboards, especially during sport events, can make them have attention of diverse audiences. As a result, the recognition level of he companies also improve. In addition, companies can market their mission and vision by choosing sport and athletes that align with their target audiences. Furthermore, sponsorship for athletes can bring the companies more profits. They can sell products or goods to the people who are influenced by their sports stars, especially fans who are willing to support their idols.
On the other hand, advertising companies by sport and sports stars can make them suffer from numerous disadvantagous effects. The process of sponsorship requires a lot of efforts and money. In fact, sponsorship deals, especially for sport and athletes, are extremely expensive, leading to burden on company’s budget. Moreover, companies can also face negative incidents. Athletes may become involve in controversies or some scandals that can tarnish the image of company. Consequently, this can have a detrimental effects on the future of the next generations.
In conclusion, I agree that companies can gain recognition as well as profit thanks to sponsor sport and sports celebrities; however, I believe that drawbacks from this sponsorship outweight these benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-20 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | Phuong1810 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | pwlihnkt | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | MichaelP | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-23 | eyraen | 67 | view |
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 89
- The diagram shows the life cycle of a salmon 78
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 78
- The given picture shows the process of making electricity from coal Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, however, may, moreover, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53461538462 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9967906897 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.542695574 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255332835613 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836732536348 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067956878383 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159207568649 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243123552979 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, however, may, moreover, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53461538462 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9967906897 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.542695574 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255332835613 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836732536348 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067956878383 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159207568649 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243123552979 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.