In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building where they live in. What are the reasons for this? how can people research this?
It is true that the concern about the history of where people are living increasingly rises in the citizens' perspective in some parts of the world. There are some reasons why people are curious about that and there are ways to break this question.
The households may want to know about the origin of the house when they find some problems with the house or when they need some changes. When the house owners find some damage in their house, they tend to question when and how their house was built or the architectural design of the house to plan proper fixing or refurbishment. Moreover, if the house renters want to make some changes such as reestablishing the interior or redecorating, they would ensure that they have the right. They may need to directly contact the original owners or previous renters to get advice and ask about the responsibilities if any accident happens.
To answer these forehead questions, they can find the information on the Internet or reach some government organisations. For example, in many modern cities, the majority of buildings and apartments are usually constructed and invested by huge construction companies. Therefore, the information about the housing managers or the detailed design of the house can be easily found on the Internet. If the renters want to require further information, they can come to some government departments that collect the legal information such as rental requirements and collections of renters. These departments are quite prevalent in some nations today.
In conclusion, the residents ask about the history of their house when they may need advice about legal information. They can search for the answer on the Internet or from departments specifying in housing and building management provide by the government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-13 | Tran Bao Long | 73 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 78
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 64
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- Some people think that it is good for a country s culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes Others think that it is better to produce these locally Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...le are living increasingly rises in the citizens perspective in some parts of the world....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14432989691 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89302181627 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494845360825 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0837202318 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.153846154 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316986434786 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11760317274 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626084459977 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204314356221 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630882047234 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.