In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is considered very important.
Why might this be the case?
Is this a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, some assert that possessing a home instead of renting one is crucial in several nations. There are somehow existing several reasons for this situation and this can also be considered a negative circumstance for some people.
Normally, there are two types of people living in a house including house owners or house renters. It is quite popular these days for people to rent a house for their personal purposes. However, this model contains some drawbacks that probably jeopardize the tenants. First, in some particular countries, especially well-developed ones, renting a house can be extremely expensive as the local people’s standard financial status is higher than in other places. Therefore, anticipating the long term, installing a house seems to be more beneficial than renting since people can save their money for other expenditures. In addition, being a tenant also means that you have to depend on the landlords who can determine whether you can continue to stay or not. This fragility can sometimes put people under pressure especially when they do not get on well with their leasers. Therefore, owning a house is better as people can let these stresses off their minds to concentrate on other important things.
However, in some facets, purchasing a house is not always easy as their personal incomes do not live up to their expectations. Mainly in developed countries, the high expenses of essential things such as gas, electricity, water,… are hailed as pivotal money consumers which makes people can not save enough money to adopt a particular house.
In conclusion, we can not deny the advantages of possessing a home since they are so reasonable. However, looking from another side, the necessity of owning a house does not always come along with the obligation as people’s finance are different and a house seems to be unaffordable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-26 | curtistran | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-21 | huuanhtruong | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-21 | huuanhtruong | 73 | view |
| 2022-05-20 | Cicihg | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | kimngan3110 | 67 | view |
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of diverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 92
- Many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning Why does this happen What are the solutions 78
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is considered very important Why might this be the case Is this a positive or negative development 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 907, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...rs. Therefore, owning a house is better as people can let these stresses off their...
^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...l things such as gas, electricity, water,… are hailed as pivotal money consumers w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17821782178 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84182371931 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564356435644 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7516119626 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.071428571 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187957614951 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714254051984 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617305896134 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124786977479 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945605585176 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 907, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...rs. Therefore, owning a house is better as people can let these stresses off their...
^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...l things such as gas, electricity, water,… are hailed as pivotal money consumers w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17821782178 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84182371931 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564356435644 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7516119626 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.071428571 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187957614951 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714254051984 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617305896134 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124786977479 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945605585176 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.