In some countries, small town-centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out-of-town stores. As a result, people without cars have limited access to out-of-town stores, and it may result in an increase in the use of cars. Do you think the disadvantages of this change outweigh its advantages?
In modern days, the ongoing demand for shopping has extended to a variety of new shops and stores, in both the suburbs and the center. However, people now have a tendency to travel to big cities’ stores instead of shopping locally. Personally, the drawbacks, which have plenty of troublesome effects for long-term strategies, do outweigh the benefits.
On the one hand, people’s preference of stores within metropolises obviously have some benefits for a number of reasons. First of all, people’s desires for the center store's products, which are of higher quality, are synchronized with an improved living condition. In other words, people will not be able to afford these exclusive objects unless they have deep pockets. Moreover, to attract more customers, the stores might have prominent offers, which are beneficial for both sides. Consequently, it will promote businesses in cities more flourishing than ever without any doubt.
On the other hand, there are various reasons why a bias preference in metropolitan area’s stores, combined with prejudice against small town-center shops, is problematic in the majority of aspects. First to mention, the rising density of vehicles is undeniable. Traffic congestion not only threatens the environment extremely, which results in worse health conditions but also causes psychological problems such as stress for humans. Furthermore, it pushes local stores down. Indeed, having their income declined, due to the fact that products cannot be introduced to the market, owners can not afford enough fees for rental and employee’s compensation, whereas expenses are increasing considerably day by day. The rural economy, therefore, cannot be developed positively.
In conclusion, the tendency of going shopping in big cities, despite various benefits regarding better businesses and higher quality living conditions, promises immense issues to the local economy and humans’ health conditions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | NHU95 | 78 | view |
- In recent years many governments have brought in laws to ban smoking in public places such as bars restaurants and offices To what extent do you agree or disagree with banning smoking in public places 61
- Although many people value their public parks this space could be better used for other purposes such as residential areas for the ever growing population or to develop business and boost economies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 67
- Many students choose to take a gap year before starting university to travel or gain work experience Do you think this is a good idea or a waste of time 78
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Criminals should be judged according to their personal circumstances rather than making them receive a fixed punishment Do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, whereas, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68941979522 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90543330825 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658703071672 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6844677922 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.133333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181502473476 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545232657191 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378358702758 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096089089415 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395982719376 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.