In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting University studies. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this.
Young generation more intend to travel or work in most countries during the transitional period of high school to university. This essay will discuss advantages and disadvantages in late teenage employment and traveling.
Cognitive development is the key advantage of traveling or employing until getting selected to university. Young school leavers improve their critical thinking and analytical skills while working. Through working they gain independency and contribute to the economy of the country. In other hand traveling is another option to spend this window period productively. Instead of reliving stress, traveling is highly beneficial to improve creative thinking and problem solving skills. Successful entrepreneurs like Elon Musk and Bill Gates entered to the workforce soon after completing the high school. Both working and traveling creates a platform for young generation to practice the theories they had learned in their class rooms.
Conversely work related stress and risk taking behaviors are major disadvantages of encouraging traveling and late teenage employment. Therefore traveling alone or as teenage groups has increased evidence of drug abuse, unplanned teenage pregnancies and comorbidities. However comparing to traveling, it might be beneficial to encourage young generation to work. Negative effects of encouraging young generation to work are developing work related stress, occupational anxiety and moderate depression. Lacking in coping skills can increase addiction to drug or alcohol.
Encouraging young people to work or travel have both positive and negative effects. These effects are highly personalized and may differ from individual to individual.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Nhi3132006 | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nhi3132006 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | Uyeen | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Nguyen Lan Chi | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | mylinh3001 | 73 | view |
- A friend of yours is thinking about applying for the same course that you did at a universtiy 73
- The diagram shows the manufacturing process for making sugar 78
- The diagram shows the process of plastic bottle recycling 61
- In some countries more and more people become more interested in finding out about the history of their houses 73
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless Give the advantages and disadvantages 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
...they had learned in their class rooms. Conversely work related stress and risk taking beh...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... traveling and late teenage employment. Therefore traveling alone or as teenage groups ha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... teenage pregnancies and comorbidities. However comparing to traveling, it might be ben...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, may, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 245.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.93469387755 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.015368106 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616326530612 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.1718254492 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.875 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3125 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314972796379 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942282038201 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668246019895 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197401765581 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366004650364 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.87 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.52 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
...they had learned in their class rooms. Conversely work related stress and risk taking beh...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... traveling and late teenage employment. Therefore traveling alone or as teenage groups ha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... teenage pregnancies and comorbidities. However comparing to traveling, it might be ben...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, may, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 245.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.93469387755 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.015368106 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616326530612 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.1718254492 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.875 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3125 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314972796379 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942282038201 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668246019895 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197401765581 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366004650364 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.87 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.52 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.