Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15, while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school. What are the benefits of each system? Which is better?
Phân tích
In this day and age, education is always regarded as a topic of interest. It is recorded that students are under obligation to study a host of subjects in some education systems while in other countries’ education, students are forced to concentrate on only their majors at the age of 15. Although each tendency has its own benefits, I believe that the former is much more advantageous.
On the one hand, limiting some subjects on the syllabus can provide students with greater motivation. Obviously, when they are allowed to study lessons that they yearn for, they are likely to put more dedication to studying, which leads to excellent studying results in lieu of having to spend time learning ones that they don’t feel passionate about. Therefore, students can intensify their possibility of success in their jobs. Moreover, if students have to study only a subset of subjects at the age of 15, they are absolutely relieved from great pressure and have more opportunity to live a more livable life by participating in extracurricular activities. For example, a Vietnamese student have to study 12 to 13 subjects on average with such a huge amount of information that they have little time to enhance their physical education as well as their integral soft skills.
However, I lean towards the opinion that schools should provide students with lessons about a wide range of subjects owing to the fact that these courses can assist students to acquire comprehensive personal development. In fact, numerous companies require employees to attain intimate knowledge related to not only this job but also other domains in life. As a result, teaching students multiple subjects can supply them with better chances for lucrative jobs and the likelihood for promotion at workplace. For instance, students specializing in medical course just need to study Biology, Mathematics and Chemistry but if they acquire non-major classes like English, they can be offered to study abroad to broaden the horizon or work at a multinational hospital compared to the ones who don’t accomplish English qualifications. Besides, having been taught an abundance of subjects until graduating, students can get an in-depth understanding of their capabilities and dreams to make a right decision about career plans.
In conclusion, each trend embraces both strength and weaknesses but I believe that it is much more beneficial for schools to organize courses of full subjects for students rather than forcing them to study certain ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-13 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | phamnhung | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | Rahat | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-08 | phuongnguyen1234 | 61 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | xuananhle | 84 | view |
- Some people prefer to live in a house while others feel that there are more advantages to living in an apartment Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in a house compared with living in an apartment Give reasons for your answer and incl 78
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents a 84
- Internet users as percentage of population
- Some people prefer to live in a house, while others feel that there are more advantages to living in an apartment. Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in a house compared with living in an apartment?Give reasons for your answer and incl 68
- The table below gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2116.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 405.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22469135802 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88717475789 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575308641975 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.560913114 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.142857143 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9285714286 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369060107671 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122128383755 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795431063569 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222647037043 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563229105034 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.