Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.
Educating the second language to kids who are not reach their puberty have many benefits. It is more than just an opinion: various studies proven that. Researchers reason that this is due to the brain structure of children in low ages which can learn second language easier. Apart from this, kids in primary school experience less curriculum with respect to secondary school. Learning new language allow kids to gain access to new world. They communicate by other culture easier and knowing the world better than others who can speak one language.
Children who learn another language are more successful in the test in comparison with others. Problem-solving, critical thinking, tolerant of diversity and creativity are the skills which can foster in kids who know second language. For instance, kids who know other language have more job opportunity in their adulthood.
In spite of all possible advantages of learning the second language in primary school, it has disadvantages too. Learning other language demand times which is time for playing by other kids. It can cause depression among children too. Also, it should be noted that in some serious cases can cause stunning in kids. That is partly because of diversity of brain structure of pupils, some of them have not sufficient intelligence to learn other languages in low ages. However, the evidence is not consistent and this issue is far from settles.
To wrap it up, in my viewpoint, it will be exceedingly hard to say: merits of learning second language in primary school is outweigh the demerits. I believe there must be limitation and principals according the IQ of children for learning second language.
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we needmusic? Is the traditional music of a country more important than theInternational music that is heard everywhere nowadays? 22
- Fatherhood ought to be emphasised as much as motherhood. The idea that women aresolely responsible for deciding whether or not to have babies leads on to the idea that theyare also responsible for bringing the children up 56
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 84
- the diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 56
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and way of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to second'
Suggestion: to second
...of children in low ages which can learn second language easier. Apart from this, kids ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to second'
Suggestion: to second
... of all possible advantages of learning second language in the primary school, it has ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to second'
Suggestion: to second
...edingly hard to say: merits of learning second language in primary school is outweigh ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
...ng second language in primary school is outweigh the demerits. I believe there must be l...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to second'
Suggestion: to second
...cording the IQ of children for learning second language.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, second, so, apart from, for instance, in my view, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08363636364 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56108448104 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556363636364 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6888128011 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2352941176 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1764705882 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47058823529 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285676166486 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902683006111 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065148665526 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178616267938 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539483322381 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.