Some experts say that the government do more to prepare for natural disasters. Other believe that dealing with the aftermath of a natural disaster should be the priority. discuss both views and give your own opinion .give reasons for your answer and include any examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Owing to human relentless interventions, the occurrence of natural calamities has been accelerated at an unprecedented rate, since the time immemorial. Though the uncertain natural disasters cannot be anticipated, but they still follow a unique pattern that can be investigated to prepare the disaster management plan. However, some camps opine the post-care and management is more imperative than the pre-planning of catastrophe. I firmly uphold the opinion that the government should pre-plan to deal with natural holocausts. This essay will provide an in-depth evaluation of the matter before coming to an appropriate conclusion.
To begin with, although, it is apparently known that no can predict an exact timing of devastating typhoons, Tsunami, floods, earthquakes, or volcano eruption etc but not impossible to track the pattern of occurrence or severity of this damage. Hence, it will provide a vivid plan to classify the disasters prone area. The development of technology has paved the path for the prediction and disaster management plan to reduce the severe damages. For example, Japan falls into the category of disasters prone area but preplanning in terms of drills of safety practices and infrastructure planning will manage to save many lives. Moreover, the precautions are always better than cure, therefore, educating and preplanning for saving the people from damages will make the situation more manageable.
On the flip side, the techniques to deal after the occurrence of disasters have required not only more attention but significant planning as well. People face a myriad of challenges to meet daily needs and sometimes the most essential medical aid aftermath the calamities as such in case of a Tsunami that was not predictable, however, led to hazardous and heinous outcomes. If better planned to deal with such unpredicted problems will save more lives and will make survival more convenient.
To conclude, it is evidently not easy rather difficult to evaluate which preparation has more significance, nevertheless, in my opinion, planning needs to be done for both pre and post the disaster simultaneously. Preplanning will limit the chances of more damage, however, the other school of thought will help to ensure safety after the disaster.
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- New household appliances have resulted in more free time for women and have enabled them to both work and run a home with dependent children What are the advantages for a family when the mother works Do you think the disadvantages outweigh the advantages 89
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- Q Some people prefer to live in suburban areas while others want to live in metro cities Which would you prefer to live 79
- Is modern education impossible without computers Which subjects can be better taught by using computers Are there parts of education that can t be taught utilizing computers 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'meeting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: meeting
...ell. People face a myriad of challenges to meet daily needs and sometimes the most esse...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1929.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44915254237 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0513299995 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59604519774 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0677299929 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.6 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214378074972 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762410347663 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590963579861 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134386937065 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366771482006 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.