Some observers say that police officer should be recruited from the communities where they work so that they have local knowledge. Other people say that this is unnecessary, or even undesirable. Where do you stand on this debate? Is local knowledge essential in modern policing?
Needless to say that the role of police in societies is paramount important. Notwithstanding, according to some, it is a desideratum that the police workforce should be a local resident in the proximity where they dwell. Others put forward that having this feature for police is of no avail or even makes the situation exacerbate. I clearly go for the first credence, and in the following, both facets will be discussed succinctly.
On the one hand, those who are the proponents of the first notion aver that should a person have an acquaintance with the local area, they can go very well with the local people if a situation comes to the worst. Accordingly, the raised problems would tend to be settled down in a tranquilized milieu in lieu of breaking out a fracas. For example, local police are familiar with the behavior of each person living in that district; therefore, they know how to communicate and socialize with people in each quarter. Moreover, such policies as they have brought up in the community are familiar with the rendezvous of malefactors, intuitively giving rise to acting on them successfully.
Meanwhile, those who are the advocators of the latter credence maintain that having local knowledge is no use, or even in some issue makes it worsen. Firstly, the taken up police might have a personal problem with a local person, and now they come up to retaliate. In this situation, as bestowed a plethora of power, they can effortlessly bring dire tribulation to revenge, which is undesirable considerably. Secondly, after a while, a person who is not a local denizen can get accustomed to the area, imbibing with all walks of life governing in the area where they are consigned. To this end, it is unnecessary to hire up police with local knowledge.
To briefly recapitulate, I single out the notion mentioned in the first paragraph. And the essay can be boiled down to two items: (1) local forces are familiar with districts and the behavior of people living in each neighborhood area. (2) After hiring, some police are going to take revenge because of having a problem with some persons previously, as well as polices from outside of the area can adapt themselves with medium immediately.
- Some people believe that the Internet has reduced the need for studying facts in history and science Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your knowledge or experience 81
- Some feel executives in large companies should receive high salaries while others think they are paid too much compared to ordinary workers Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people say that art subjects such as music, drama and creative writing are an essential part of education, and every school should include them in its syllabus. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and examples from your ow 100
- The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that children spent watching television 85
- Nowadays in many countries women have full time jobs.Therefore, it is logical to share household tasks evenly between men and women.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, briefly, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90425531915 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87845586183 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515957446809 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0503790114 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308559584741 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103218609771 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603041673044 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194875078169 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677383656172 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.