Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 254 words.
People have different perspectives on outfit of employees in workplace versus their productivity. Although many companies thought that their employees need to wear nice outfits to look smart and confident others believe in performance and quality of work. In my opinion, good quality of work is way more important and beneficial for both the employee and employer in the long run.
On the one hand, people who work in the corporate world need to dress up properly to look smart, according to some. In other words, good looking attire helps these corporate workers to identify themselves as a part of the organization and to feels confident about their work and office culture. For instances, big corporate office culture always encourage their employees to look good and presentable. The main reason behind this idea is to impress their clients and also not to fall behind from their business competitors.
On the other hand, it is often thought that it is better to concentrate on the quality of work and I agree. The reason behind this thought is at the end of the day it is the quality of the work which counts. High quality of work will increase the productivity and overall performance of the workers and also employees will get huge satisfaction. This is why; the corporate culture is changing rapidly. For example, Google and Facebook employees are not following any dress codes and casual dresses like jeans are also allowed to wear in the office but they give importance to the quality of work. Therefore, the freedom and liberty these workers are getting from their organizations make them stress free and happy. In the long run companies can have a group of sustainable employees with high performance and productivity.
In conclusion, despite people having different views, I believe it would be better to give the preference on the quality of work as it will promote a good work culture and will provide a group of sustainable employees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | maria ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | dolle123 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 56 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 79
- The pie charts below give data on the spending and consumption of resources by countries of the world and how the population is distributed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You shou
- IT is generally believed that the internet is an excellent means of communication but some people suggest that it may not be the best place to find information Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people think that it is important to use leisure time for activities that improve the mind such as reading and doing word puzzles Other people think that it is important to rest the mind during leisure time Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The pie charts below give data on the spending and consumption of resources by countries of the world and how the population is distributed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98170731707 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73904719492 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481707317073 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5772788092 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.933333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231527139277 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798149460179 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417324587793 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14590330951 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342466221298 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.