Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is believed by some employers that the people working should follow a dress code according to the place where they work, while others believe that the quality of the work they pursue is more important than appearance. In my opinion, it is important to dress smartly, but pursuing a quality work is also an aspect one should care about.
On one hand, we live in a society where how one looks is very important, and first impressions do matter for a lot of people. The image of a business is mirrored in the way that the employers not only act, but how they look, so that is why dressing accordingly to the image of the place one works is important. For example, if one works at a bank, he should have a more formal dress code, like a suit, but if one works at a children playground he should have a more casual outfit on.
On the other hand, the appearance is not the only important thing, The quality of the work pursued is also an important aspect of the work ethic. If one wants to be appreciated at work, he should give his best to follow the deadlines, show appropriate behaviour and be nice to the colleagues and customers. When looking at a CV, the employer is interested in seeing one's skills and accomplishments rather then how good one can dress. For example, if a person works from home, we can't talk about following a dress code because there is none; the only thing that matters is if he is interested, ambitious and does his best in doing his work.
In conclusion, depending on the place one works, both of these aspects can be less or more important. Employees should care about both if they want to create the best image of themselves possible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | maria ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | dolle123 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 56 | view |
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- Many people believe that social networking sites such as Facebook have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree 56
- It is often considered that change is more beneficial to people than trying to avoid it and have everything remain the same Do you think the advantages of change outweight the disadvantages 73
- With the rise of e books comes the decline in paper books Some people see this as a good step forward while others do not What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...V, the employer is interested in seeing ones skills and accomplishments rather then ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
... ones skills and accomplishments rather then how good one can dress. For example, if...
^^^^
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...xample, if a person works from home, we cant talk about following a dress code becau...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, look, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46405228758 5.12529762239 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5313532263 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496732026144 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.9054668058 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.181818182 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8181818182 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21023720204 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914225475433 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628473895913 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145670667102 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669455139698 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 12.4159519038 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.