Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
A number of companies on the opinion that it is vital to dress properly and on the other hand, others reckon that despite the appearance, it is better to have a decent work in the office. In my view I believe that the quality of work is more crucial than the appearance. The essay will elaborate the reasons about this.
It is apparent that majority of organizations tend to provide rules and regulations for their workers. The main purpose of these rules are to have a high stand company. One of major believe and rule is that the employees need to have a proper dress. It is vital to have a decency in the office consequently, it will lead to have a standard organization eventually. With my personal experience for the majority of people it is hard to wear the same dress code every day. Due to the current fashionable world people fond to dress numerous decodes. As an adult I am convinced that adults need to take the responsibility to wear properly and companies need to give the freedom for their workers. Moreover, the outer appearance cannot improve the business of an organization.
Nevertheless, the quality of work is the integral part of an organization. In order to have a significant yield from the business it is better to work hard rather than thinking about the dress. For instance, in China the employees have the freedom to wear what ever they want in the office nonetheless, the distinguished companies tend to get the maximum out put from their employees and that is the reason that China's economy is the strongest economy in the world.
To sum up, it is apparent that organizations have to maximize their work rather than strict their employees in to a dress. Eventually by quality of work, organizations will improve their standards automatically.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | maria ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | dolle123 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 56 | view |
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 11
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 72
- Some people believe that to give opportunities to the new generation companies should encourage high level employees who are older than 55 to retire Do you agree or disagree 11
- Some people think that when a person travels into a different culture they should adapt to the local practices and customs 61
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, for instance, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78246753247 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8698709262 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461038961039 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0200065423 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0625 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211782492796 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724662349357 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533314432932 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144734611748 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409494285347 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.