Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There have been different views regarding employees in the workplace. While some companies believe that their workers should have a good appearance, I would argue that the productivity of work is more essential.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why appearance is important in firms. Firstly, the culture of a particular company can be exposed through workers. For example, my mother claimed that a bank is more professional than other banks as she saw the beauty of girls in a bank and the high devotion of theirs. Secondly, there would be a high number of jobs demanding a good appearance and communication skill. To illustrate this, a retailer with a wonderful smile and beautiful dress is able to attract more consumers. This can lead to increase the revenue of an organization.
On the other hand, I would agree with those who believe the quality of work is more crucial. The first reason is that employees' intelligence and creativeness could contribute to the success of a company. A significant number of employers recruit workers having good experiences and high qualifications rather than appearances like Samsung, Viettel company in Viet Nam. Thus, these firms could operate and market their products to the public in a good way basing on these excellent workers. Moreover, attempts can create high results rather than initial appearance. For instance, many people were born with unusual appearance such as very short or blind. However, they always try their best to gain wonderful certificates and give interesting ideas to help organizations.
In conclusion, while there are some benefits to believe that nice clothes and appearance are essential in companies, my own view is that quality of work should be more valued
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | maria ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | dolle123 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 56 | view |
- SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT GOVERNMENTS SHOULD BAN DANGEROUS SPORTS WHILE OTHERS THINK PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE FREEDOM TO DO ANY SPORTS OR ACTIVITY DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OWN OPINION 61
- Many people say that universities should only offer places to young students with the highest marks while others say they should accept people of all ages even if they did not do well at school Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills To what extent you agree or disagree 73
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea What are the reasons What solutions to solve the issue 78
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea What are the reasons What solutions to solve the issue 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
... more crucial. The first reason is that employees intelligence and creativeness could con...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14084507042 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88630177716 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584507042254 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2141692139 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.25 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3125 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232549770932 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652055300243 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072686045682 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163888045673 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0842985228083 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.