Some parents should spend time on reading or telling stories to children, while others thinks that children can read through a variety of sources such as books, TV and Internet by themselves. Discuss both view and give opinion.
It is argued by some that parents need to spend their quality time amusing their offspring such as reading or telling stories, whereas there are people, who believe that children could do those things on their own via an array of sources. In my opinion, i concur with both the former and the latter.
There are two main benefits of story telling by parents. Firstly, this kind of communication could strengthen family bonds. In fact, one and one conversations may occur between parents and their offspring when parents explain the stories in books for their children, consequently, there could be an increase in mutual understanding. Secondly, without parental supervision, the quality of books or other sources read by children could not be guaranteed. A case in a point is in Vietnam, where there are a number of sensitive content only for adults books are floating in Vietnamese market.
Apart from aforementioned notion, others claim that due to the emergence of manifold sources to entertain, children could explore by themselves without material restriction by parents. It is true that having a liberty to imagine and discover the outside world could broaden children’s horizon significantly and they could also have an ability to recognize their interests earlier than their peers. Another explanation for this view is that children should be given the right to learn about independence at early age. Specifically, being able to decide how to read or listen to stories is could be an effective way to help children enhance their self-reliant skills.
In conclusion, there are some arguments about how children reading books and stories. From my perspective, both parents telling story or children explore independently have own positive influences on children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling. 61
- Scientists tell us that some activities are good for health and others are bad. Despite knowing that, millions of people still continue doing unhealthy activities. What are the causes and what are the solutions for this? 56
- There is a general increase in anti-social behaviors and lack of respect for others. What are the causes and solutions? 89
- The two maps below shw an island, before and after the constrction of some tourist dacilities 78
- The charts below show that what UK graduate and postgraduates students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...via an array of sources. In my opinion, i concur with both the former and the lat...
^
Line 9, column 592, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...decide how to read or listen to stories is could be an effective way to help child...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, apart from, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32862190813 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90709013791 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590106007067 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.866009722 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3846153846 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27429980873 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103827473613 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693433875918 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192204451992 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519541016978 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.