Some people agree with spending lots of money on a large wedding, while others think it is a waste of money? What is your opinion?
In this present era, where everything is expensive which are related to human beings. So, wedding is now debatable in our society, where some of the individuals deem that spending the savings on weddings are joy while, the opponents consider it as a waste of money. In my opinion, such expenses should be saved for the future as well as it can be invested.
Firstly, I think that a big ceremonies will consume lots of savings. Relatives, neighbors, family friends and friends will be invited for such party and this will cost a lot of money to order items of cuisines for them. According, to my experience, when my sister was getting married 110+ people were invited which cost more than 5 lac. Furthermore, this money can be used for those things which will be required after marriage which will not create a burden on the brides. Secondly, the amount can also be given to the poor in our society who don’t get a food for a single time. Which, will help them to build a small shop.
This cash can be invested in different organization which will generate some money for their daily life expenses and they will not require any job for the money. For instance, my uncle daughter has invested all of her marriage expense in a private firm from where she gets 600 dollars every week. Moreover, they can also insert their currency in a life insurance from where they can get benefits like, children school fees.
In conclusion, many people believe that spending a lot of money for marriages would bring happiness and contentment, I personally think that such occasions are a waste of money. Saving this money for use in the future is a much better idea.
- The graph below shows the population figures of different types of turtles in India between 1980 and 2012 78
- The charts below shows the spending of school in UK from 1981 to 2001 73
- The table below shows the in which sector of the economy different age groups were employed 84
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problem is to Increase the price of fuel 56
- Some people use social media to keep in touch with other people and news events Do you think advantages of this technology outweigh the disadvantages 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... is now debatable in our society, where some of the individuals deem that spending the savi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 29, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'ceremony'?
Suggestion: ceremony
... invested. Firstly, I think that a big ceremonies will consume lots of savings. Relatives...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 554, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'food'.
Suggestion: food
...o the poor in our society who don’t get a food for a single time. Which, will help the...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 580, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...who don’t get a food for a single time. Which, will help them to build a small shop. ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65529010239 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43863282905 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576791808874 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2382945668 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4285714286 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190058497873 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733297498399 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916429560009 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147410401831 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834741729691 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.