Some people argue that we should do research into our family history. Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is increasingly common for people in different nations to investigate the research into their family history. There are many reasons behind this tendency including better health choices, and strengthening relationships. While many people believe that the past cannot be changed, instead of wasting time for those reasons, we need to concentrate on the present and future. This essay will attempt to discuss in more depth both views.
To begin with, there is no doubt that doing research on family history can be attributed to some reasons. First of all, there are a variety of inherited diseases in the world so investigating the family history can be beneficial in acknowledging many potential risks, preventing these diseases, and finding a treatment for them. Secondly, these people tend to connect with their relatives. More specifically, people can find their relatives whom they lost contact with due to geographical barriers or wars. Another note-worthy reason is that many people can be proud of their family history because of their ancestors' credibility and respectability. Moreover, it encourages them to preserve family's traditions and contribute to society to gain more credit and respect. Finally, these actions can be regarded as a good talking point with families and friends, fostering family relationships.
On the other hand, there are many reasons why some people think that we just need to focus on the present and future. The first reason is that researching family history may reveal some facts such as ancestors' crime records that make future generations uncomfortable. In addition, many people believe that the past cannot be changed so instead of wasting time on digging up family history, the present and future should be prioritised. It is more important and meaningful to contribute to society and make positive influences.
In conclusion, some people have a tendency to investigate family history while others think that it is important to focus on the present and future. From my perspective, I am convinced that time is a limited resource so we need to allocate it efficiently to meaningful aspects in the present and future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-27 | tieuquynh | 70 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | tieuquynh | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | annenguyen0203 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Anne020304 | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | Elenochka315 | 89 | view |
- The use of social media e g Facebook and Twitter is replacing face to face contact for many people in everyday life Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Some people argue that we should do research into our family history Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ttributed to some reasons. First of all, there are a variety of inherited disease...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28985507246 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91997301119 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507246376812 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3267684063 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.352941176 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2941176471 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88235294118 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271628374115 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894406447767 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574946649154 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170023877302 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397548392763 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.