Some people believe that children who have permission to make their own decisions in everyday matters would become selfish members of society in the future. Although there are a number of drawbacks in this trend, I admittedly believe the benefits accrue to children are by no means negligible.
On the one hand, the most rational justification is that letting children choose everything they like increases their expectations in life. To put it differently, children would always want to be admired and cannot hear and accept opposite opinions, just thinking about their desires. Take when working as employees in the future, these children would have problems in the workplace with their colleagues and managers, just thinking of their wishes and do not care about other ideas as an example. This in turn will put their job prospects in jeopardy and adversely affect their social life.
On the other hand, the opposite view asserts that decide by children has more advantages for them. Simply put, It has positive impressions on their mental and personal attitudes. The more they are allowed to make decisions the more their self-confidence and responsibility will be increased. A good illustration could be individuals who can find a better way in difficult situations and accept it's potential effects due to their background in their childhood. They also do not afraid of making mistakes and learned how to tackle problems. That is to say, they determined obstacles and wrong choices should not discourage them.
To sum up, considering the points discussed above, make a decision by children can be both rewarding and problematic. While it may lay a foundation for being a greedy person, I admittedly believe it's extensive positive impacts on personality worth its drawbacks.
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be compulsory part of high school programs for example working for charity improve the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 84
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be compulsory part of high school programs for example working for charity improve the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extend do you agree or disagree 61
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, while, to sum up, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20905923345 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86139735926 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599303135889 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9146837661 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.785714286 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329533731061 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991833144996 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909266632834 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186118149133 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100940474983 0.056905535591 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.