Some people believe that face to
face communication is always more powerful than
written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples.
Communication is part and parcel of life.although, some people reckon that face to face communication is always more powerful than written communication, in my opinion, i strongly, agree with given statement,. Some reasons for my inclinations are articulated in ensuring paragraphs.
Firstly, the biggest reason to support my notion is that in face to face conversation people can express their emotion to each other. And also, people without hesitate talk with their partner. Furthermore, in direct communication communicators can express their emotions by gestures and hand movements. However, both communicators easily understand the talks. Hence, people perceive the real value of talks in direct communication so that face to face meetings is powerful communication. For instance, old people use direct communication with other people to build strong relationship.
In addition, people can not understand the value of talks in text communication. Consequently, misunderstanding happen between communicators. To show, in technology era, people use social media apps like Facebook and Whatsapp and chat with their friends and family. It is fruitless communication. People can not prove what is real and fake in talks. Thus, direct communication is far better than text communication.
In a nutshell, people have to use direct communication because it gives real value of communication instead of written communication. The advantages of face to face relationship still outweigh the disadvantages of written text.
- Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 56
- The charts display the quantity of oil production and consumption in million barrels per day in seven areas of the world in year 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 59
- Nowadays artificial intelligence is being used to drive cars why is this happening is it a positive or negative development 61
- In the past people wore their traditional clothes and followed their culture These days most people wear similar clothes and therefore look very similar to one another Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 78
- Many people nowadays travel abroad for their university education.Why do people do this? Would you consider doing this yourself and why?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
..., i strongly, agree with given statement,. Some reasons for my inclinations are ar...
^^
Line 13, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... In a nutshell, people have to use direct communication because it gives re...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, still, thus, for instance, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 225.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80444444444 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49788225172 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 176.041082164 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537777777778 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.146371516 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.625 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0625 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352214970608 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114814328685 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105403377238 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242848739069 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909330367011 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.77 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.