Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who wants to study in universities
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In this contemporary epoch, it is apparent that tuition fees required to enroll in colleges or universities are necessary for students all over the world. This culminates in a common occurrence that governments in some developed and developing countries provide funding for their education. While I agree that this engenders some drawbacks to some extent, I would argue that governmental actions of fully covering these expenses are beneficial.
The predominant problem is derived from the fact that offering governmantal scholarships poses grave ramifications to students’ behavior. Given that there is no concern about the universities’ fees, they are likely to lose their discipline and dilligence, bringing about neglectful attitudes towards the norm that they ought to make their best of learning, thus adversely affecting study performances. Consequently, the money is now considered to be such a substantial loss, in the meantime the governments are to blame for making cutbacks on national budget which can instead be allocated to other aspects.
However, I strongly opine that governments’ financial assistance is a prerequisite. The first and perhaps the most persuasive reason for this is that all students, for the aid of free tuition, can have equal opportunities to pursue their academic path. By this I mean, regardless of learners’ families monetary background, they are utterly facilitated to place a premium on a non-disruptive educational pursuit without any hardship. As a result, those desperate to make ends meet will not only be enabled to prioritize on acquiring knowledge wholeheartedly, but also pave the way for fundamental innovations to be fostered. In addition, paying fees for graduates will enrich professional labourers for the countries in the future. In other words, that the authorities wholly sponsor students’ educational pursuit will generate a potential workforce in which people have high qualifications as well as wealth of intellectual and practical experience. Hence, providing further education is unquestionably one of the long-term measures taken to attain more experienced workers, with a view to tackling countries’ current issues related to technology, economy and public health.
In conclusion, from the aforementioned points, it is my reaffirmation that governments’ attempt to pay fees for university and college students is a conducive action. It is advisable that universities and governments should adopt partly-paid policies and stricter criteria to improve the quality of learning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-10 | thanh1927540 | 89 | view |
- In the past people liked to store knowledge in books However in the present we prefer to store knowledge on the Internet Do you think it is a positive or a negative trend 89
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and giv 89
- Write a paragraph of about 180 220 words about the benefits and drawbacks of advertising 56
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, while, i mean, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2176.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71128608924 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36754714768 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632545931759 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.6763493385 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.066666667 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248984547576 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759335009095 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521109577022 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151626141847 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642919426175 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 78.4519038076 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.