Some people believe a high salary is the most important factor when choosing a job. Others believe that a good working environment is more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different views about what factor is the key to a good job. While many people believe that the financial aspect is the most crucial, I would argue that working condition has higher priority.
On the one hand, there are various reasons why people believe that the higher salary they would get for a job, the better it is. Firstly, with a greater amount of money they receive, they could spend more on their hobbies. For example, they could save money for traveling many times a year, which is costly and impossible to do without money. Secondly, as many people work in order to earn money to feed themselves and their families, they would do anything to get a higher salary. For instance, most young people in big cities such as Tokyo or Shanghai have many loans, which costs them a great amount of money monthly.
On the other hand, I am of the opinion that people should apply for a job which has a better working environment. First, to have a good career path, people need to work in a place where they can learn more knowledge and acquire essential skills. As a result, they would be mature enough to be promoted to more important positions. For example, new IT graduates usually start working as programmers and then become team leaders after about three to five working years. Additionally, as living conditions are increasing rapidly, people do not work for food but happiness. This makes people prioritize highly working conditions such as promotion opportunities or working time.
In conclusion, while a good salary is important to employees, I believe the working environment should be considered first when looking for a job.
- More big shopping malls are being built and they replace small shops Is this a positive or negative development 56
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case, and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 67
- Whether or not someone achieve their aims is mostly by luck. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Art classes such as painting or drawing are important for children's development, so it should be compulsory in high school. Do you agree or disagree? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85512367491 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52133945903 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551236749117 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.0705039104 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.1428571429 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268183681455 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103061140569 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073356877304 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201047572429 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723113072459 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.