Some individuals are of the opinion that it is essential to share information freely in all aspects such as scientific research, business because it brings lots of benefits to society while others believe that not all information could be shared freely to the public due to valuable. Although both schools of thought hold a value of relevance, both aspects have their advantages and disadvantages.
On the one hand, some people support sharing information because of some reason. Firstly, free access to information in the academic world can help everyone facilitate their work and study. For instance, if the successful businessman shares his experience about running his business effectively, others will learn and start his business the right way. Besides, sharing useful data helps students can easily enhance the progress of their study and integrate information. Secondly, other researchers can come up with novel ideas bases on the previously available data to help the community better.
On the other hand, some people argue that there is some crucial and valuable information to keep confidential because of some reasons. Some pieces of information are important because they are discovered with the effort and hard work of a person or a team. If the data leaks out, some people will take advantage of it and steal it illegally. For instance, if a person invents some latest technology, the competitors will easily create a similar invention for their personal attain. Moreover, some fields are too dangerous to widespread. For example, some terrorists can use free information to produce bombs. This should not be shared freely on the Internet.
In conclusion, any knowledge can be distributed to the public to help certain aspects and improve society but some information should be restricted to share with the public.
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as unsatifactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your opinion 79
- The chart andgraph below give information about participants who have enteredthe Olympics since it began Summarise the information by selecting and reporting on the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period 67
- Some people think that people moving to a new country should accept new culture in the foreign country rather than living as a separate minority group with different lifestyle Do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30479452055 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81977866454 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551369863014 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6946436682 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.266666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413185260777 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134463674925 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892520055717 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24073807164 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612261740391 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.