Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these view and give your own opinion.
While some proponents indicate that scientists, businessmen and the academic world should exchange as much information as possible, opponents argue the opposite. This essay will shed light on both views before concluding that individuals and organizations should limit the information that could be made public.
On the one hand, shared researches could be time-saving and a good base for future projects. Many inventions today are invented owing to the knowledge that was published by pioneers in many fields. Vaccination, for instance, saved thousands of lives and became an essential part of life, which wouldn't happened if the inventor of it didn't share his knowledge. Those information could also save later scientists and businessmen a considerably amount of time. As gathering information is usually time-consuming, people who work in the academic world could save time by collecting data from previous research.
On the other hand, certain information should be kept in secret for 2 reasons. The first one is some information could bring back profit for the ones who keep it, especially in the financial world. Investors who own statistics that show which investment would gain them a fortune should never share it with anyone, for example. Another reason is knowledge could sometimes have an adverse bearing on the health of the society. Particularly in the science world and medical world, if a dangerous substain is found and used for bad purposes such as poisoning, it will harm millions of lives, affecting the globe workforce and economy.
In conclusion, while published information could provide foundation for further researched and save time, I believe that it should be limited as some information could bring back significant financial values and greatly affect the public's health.
- Some people think the money spent on developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- More and more people today are choosing to eat only healthy food and are making time to exercise regularly Why is this What can be done to encourage other people to eat only healthy food and to make time to exercise regularly 73
- Crimes committed by young people are increasing in major cities throughout the world Discuss the causes and how to solve this problem 56
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 294, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...became an essential part of life, which wouldnt happened if the inventor of it didnt sh...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 333, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... wouldnt happened if the inventor of it didnt share his knowledge. Those information ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 360, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'Those informations'?
Suggestion: This information; Those informations
...ventor of it didnt share his knowledge. Those information could also save later scientists and bu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 427, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('considerably') instead an adjective, or a noun ('amount') instead of another adjective.
...o save later scientists and businessmen a considerably amount of time. As gathering information is us...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 232, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...financial values and greatly affect the publics health.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39716312057 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8991047948 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620567375887 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5260631927 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.076923077 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232666396685 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828882572097 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561054817824 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151559122815 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027906514491 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.