Nowadays people depend on technology for leisure activities. Is this a positive or
negative development?
In this modern era, it has become increasingly common for people to use cutting-edge equipment for entertainment. Although technology provides an unlimited source of information and recreational apps that unwind and develop human’ mind, it might be harmful for people’ health and have negative repercussions on their interaction with surrounding relationships, which is negative overall.
State-of-the-art technology in recent years offer users with a wide range of informations and entertainment that could entertain and support their study at the same time. Searching tools such as Google keep people updated with an endless amount of knowledge and news. Therefore, adults could read the latest news on their phone or watch it on TV during breaktime for entertainment. Additionally, technology entertain human by a large number of video games and apps. Youtube, for instance, provides an unlimited source of entertaining videos such as music videos from famous singers or short films, and it is used worldwide by people of different age groups.
However, technology could also brings back some detrimental effects on people’ health and relationships. This is because modern technology might lead to a sedentary lifestyle, in which people would spend all day in their room watching movies or playing video games. Consequently, a higher rate of obesity resulting from lack of physical activities can cause higher risks of having heart problems. Furthermore, people might lose their connection with their relationships in real life since they spend most of their time online. As a result, children might have no friends during their childhood, and this gradually leads to mental problems as they grow up.
In conclusion, technology keep people updated and help them relax, however, it could also lead to health problems and have an adverse bearing on the relationship between each person and their family and friends, which a negative development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-01 | linh allie | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-29 | vidung | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-25 | Mollymaul | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-11 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-07 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
- Crimes committed by young people are increasing in major cities throughout the world Discuss the causes and how to solve this problem 78
- Many people use social media to get in touch with other people and know about news events Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Many people now use written language in a less formal and more relaxed way than in the past Why is this the case Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Nowadays people depend on technology for leisure activities Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Many students find it difficult to focus or pay attention at school nowadays What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 426, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...tionally, technology entertain human by a large number of video games and apps. Youtube, for inst...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'bring'
Suggestion: bring
...groups. However, technology could also brings back some detrimental effects on people...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5049833887 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04185074071 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4575374637 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.461538462 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221366179783 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791336147621 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533276796044 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145043881574 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722812544421 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.