People hold controversial viewpoints about where the experts should work. While some believe they should find a job where they were trained, I totally support the other side that they have their own right to choose where they start their career.
There is an understandable reason for those who argue professionals should be limited to their jobs in a certain country. They may believe that experts such as doctors and engineers should take responsibility for using their expertise to develop the region where they were educated. They may receive support and money from governments and organizations inside the country, so they have to contribute their knowledge and efforts back to the sponsors. For example, some scholarship programs for abroad students require two years of employment after they finish the education program. Thereby, the donators can earn profits from who they invested in.
However, I strongly concur that the learners have the freedom in securing workplaces. They should have the right to apply for domestic work as well as international occupation to satisfy their own purpose. For instance, in Vietnam, many bachelors and engineers search for a permanent job in Western countries, where they believe they can gain their expertise, professional work culture, and higher salaries. As a result, some of them rapidly become high-level workforce when they come back and significantly develop their hometown. This is enormously beneficial for both individuals and developed countries like Vietnam.
In conclusion, many people may think professional employees should work in the country where they learn, I advocate they can work in anywhere they want as their personal satisfaction.
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 73
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43396226415 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84051950984 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581132075472 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2818102651 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.769230769 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467361833998 0.244688304435 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16768917005 0.084324248473 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109395462174 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328731856398 0.151304729494 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505269660965 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.